Paul Wolfe wrote:I reread through this thread and indeed it's been civil, I apologize for sounding abrasive.camdenlp wrote:Paul, I understand what you mean. But where is the shit-talking in this thread? Looks pretty civil imho. If anything, I believe your comments are as abrasive as any sometimes. Sorry, I just don't see this thread as anything more than a difference in opinions.
As for the "in today's dollars" concept, I get that, with inflation and all. However, I believe you could still build the guitar Randy had for that price. The price of wood isn't that steep, you just have to know what you're doing. There's a HUGE profit margin built into all of these things - the wood, the parts, etc. The actual cost for the manufacturer is not in the $1000s.
Yeah, you could build an object that looked like a guitar for the same price Randy paid in 1978, $750. It will even make a sound.
But you will not get quality.
It's like saying "I paid $5000 for a hyundai, it gets me from A to B, so I dont see why ANYONE would possibly want to spend $75,000 on a BMW... it's still ONLY a car, and they both have an exhaust...".
Plumbers (you have to connect one pipe with another, and make sure the shit runs downhill) get paid a higher hourly rate more than 99% of luthiers. There is a massive difference in their skill set, not to mention tools and machinery, yet no one would have a problem paying a plumber their fees.
Guitarists are spoiled. Price up a half decent cello or violin one day

I'm lucky my clients don't all share this view. Of the last ten guitars I sold, the cheapest was $6750. I can assure you, those guys see (and hear) the difference
