50K wrote:I agree that some things may have been some extra ammo for Doug and Kelly, those things are very small and editable and I'm sure Peter would not have not done anything to help his effort fail. I'm not going to say anything bad about Bob Daisley because I have limited info about that one. I do know that Bob was demanding (MONEY) the minute Peter stepped off the plane. I agree Bob is due his royalties from Ozzy, but out of all the people that contributed to this film the only ones that met Peter with a money agenda was Doug Rhoads, Kelly Garni, The Brothers & Bob Daisley. Everyone else contributed information without demanding money or control influence. Question: Do you think that before Randy Rhoads can have a film or live footage released that everyone involved should benefit and be paid? For one, the budget for the film would be so large that only the Osbournes would be able to afford it and would have to care allot about Randy more than themselves because it would be hard to make a profit once everyone was paid for (Information). Again please don't take my word for it! seek out the truth yourself and make sure you ask someone that is not asking for control or money like the Holy Grailers listed above.
Shawn, I do agree that there were more things associated with the shelving of the film! The Bob Daisley thing was also very Public and another strike against Peter and more ammo for Doug and Kelly. Information from the three people were needed for the film, but not the entire film. If you don't see a selfish pattern, you are just star struck plain and simple. The Box set was cool! just think what it would have been like if the Brothers, Doug Kelly and Bob Daisley would have just did this for Randy instead of the their own bank account. The fans would have allot to post about! something most of you have been complaining about.
regards,
50K
The way I look at it is...
Peter did himself no favours with the way he treated people, here and other places.
Garni did himself no favours associating with well known lunatics.
Bob has always been fantastic with the fans and is extremely approachable, so I would find it hard to believe, not impossible but hard to believe, that he is telling pork pies when it comes to his experiences with all this.
Doug well mmm I have nothing good or bad to say about the man, his actions are to be judged by his family, as that is the circle he revolves in.
As far as being star struck, I find that argument extremely weak, my observations have been made from the public actions of those involved. I welcome scrutiny of them, the observations that is, in fine detail.
I must admit that it is hard for me to follow your train of thought, and logical analysis, for two reasons. The first is that you are posting with venom not critical analysis. The second is your bias, it seems that you are saying that Peter did no wrong, some of it reads like a PR campaign.
The sad thing about this is the pain I’m sure this has caused all those involved, especially the Rhoads family. We the fans have lost out because of it as well, but we are lucky, it is easy for us to put on a song and disappear into the music. For those who have had their relationships strained or destroyed because of this, have come out suffering from the experience, when in fact it should have brought people together to remember Randy.
I have said many times before; it is safer to enjoy the art, than to get to know the artist.
50K or whoever you can calll Fred and I wacked out , it's easy to do in a forum since I guess you are the real one who knows and only sees "the truth" in your eyes. I am not perfect don't do everything perfect and never said I did. 
