Clean vs. Dirty

Talk about musical equipment, guitars, drums, bass, synths anything.

Moderators: Randy Perry, The Flying Dutchman, Stiltzkin, skezza, Trigger

rice_pudding
Mass Poster
Posts: 1734
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:49 pm
Location: UK

Clean vs. Dirty

Post by rice_pudding »

I was just wondering out of all the guitar players on here (and bass players - why not?!), what do you prefer, a clean tone or a dirty tone?

in the last year i find myself going for a clean tone almost all the time. I like distorted tones too but i always find that something about them dissapoints me. But if i use a clean tone that just starting to get cooking im content. If i use distortion i always end up tweaking it but its never perfect.

These days i just plug into my epi valve junior at about 9/10 o'clock, just where it starts to get some drive. I dont even have the volume on my guitar all the way up. Mike me up and i'd use it for playing gigs. :D
User avatar
McLowery
Madman
Posts: 301
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:27 am
Location: Vancouver, WA

Post by McLowery »

I have done the same thing over the years. I used to crank the preamp gain all the way and slowly but surely it's backed down to about 55-60% over the years. I don't play through tube amps, never have, and the only solid state amp I have found that gives nice power section saturation is my Gallien Krueger 250ML, It gets grittier as the volume goes up, in a nice sounding overdrive. All my other amps I am forced to use the pre-amp gain stages. (I love my Randall RG100es crunch, nothing is similar) and my new Zoom G2.1u is giving me fantastic results live. I personally like the edgy, cold chainsaw buzz of diodes cooking as opposed to tubes.

The addition of a more clean signal in your tone makes total sense to me these days. Clean is always more percussive and punchy along with the guitars natural unaltered harmonic overtones. Giving it just enough push to go into the grind of overdrive lets you hit harder, louder and dynamics are WAY better.
Oh bring me some CHUNKY PUDDING, and bring it RIGHT NOW!!!
LordThurisaz
Cool Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:05 pm

Re: Clean vs. Dirty

Post by LordThurisaz »

rice_pudding wrote:I was just wondering out of all the guitar players on here (and bass players - why not?!), what do you prefer, a clean tone or a dirty tone?

in the last year i find myself going for a clean tone almost all the time. I like distorted tones too but i always find that something about them dissapoints me. But if i use a clean tone that just starting to get cooking im content. If i use distortion i always end up tweaking it but its never perfect.

These days i just plug into my epi valve junior at about 9/10 o'clock, just where it starts to get some drive. I dont even have the volume on my guitar all the way up. Mike me up and i'd use it for playing gigs. :D
I play with both clean and dirty tones. When practicing something, I'll play clean to get it down and with the proper dynamics. As far as dirty goes, I'm kinda more like Eddie where I like sustain mostly with just a bit of crunch. Sounds better than full on distortion, which sounds a little like a tyrannysaurus Rex taking a dump with difficulty.
LTD FX260 [Dist/Jazz] [9s, E/Drop D]
LTD H500 [Dist/Jazz] [9s, D/Drop C]
LTD H1001 [81/85] [10s, C#/Drop B]
GCB-95 [mod soon]
Boss SD-1 [mod soon]
Fryette Sig:X [soon]
Ampeg V412 [Emi Governor/MOW]
Randall RS412LB [Emi Super V]
DR strings
frank
Student & Friend of Randy
Posts: 1150
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 3:45 am

Post by frank »

lately i find myself using the ac30 setting on my vox hybrid. i set just a bit of gain, enough to give the tone some bite but still sound clear and pretty. the chords ring and the lead has just enough grit.
Last edited by frank on Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
rice_pudding
Mass Poster
Posts: 1734
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:49 pm
Location: UK

Post by rice_pudding »

McLowery wrote:I have done the same thing over the years. I used to crank the preamp gain all the way and slowly but surely it's backed down to about 55-60% over the years. I don't play through tube amps, never have, and the only solid state amp I have found that gives nice power section saturation is my Gallien Krueger 250ML, It gets grittier as the volume goes up, in a nice sounding overdrive. All my other amps I am forced to use the pre-amp gain stages. (I love my Randall RG100es crunch, nothing is similar) and my new Zoom G2.1u is giving me fantastic results live. I personally like the edgy, cold chainsaw buzz of diodes cooking as opposed to tubes.

The addition of a more clean signal in your tone makes total sense to me these days. Clean is always more percussive and punchy along with the guitars natural unaltered harmonic overtones. Giving it just enough push to go into the grind of overdrive lets you hit harder, louder and dynamics are WAY better.
didnt the guy in Rush use a Galien Krueger?
rice_pudding
Mass Poster
Posts: 1734
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:49 pm
Location: UK

Post by rice_pudding »

frank wrote:lately i find myself using the ac30 setting on my vox hybrid. i set just a bit of gain, enough to give the tone some bite but still sound clear and pretty. the chords ring and the lead has just enough grit.
you have a vox hybrid too? Very nice 8) i like using the fender dual reverb setting. A little too loose sounding for heavy rock IMO. But it has a great range tones from clean to driven that you can get just by the way you play.
LordThurisaz
Cool Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:05 pm

Post by LordThurisaz »

rice_pudding wrote:
McLowery wrote:I have done the same thing over the years. I used to crank the preamp gain all the way and slowly but surely it's backed down to about 55-60% over the years. I don't play through tube amps, never have, and the only solid state amp I have found that gives nice power section saturation is my Gallien Krueger 250ML, It gets grittier as the volume goes up, in a nice sounding overdrive. All my other amps I am forced to use the pre-amp gain stages. (I love my Randall RG100es crunch, nothing is similar) and my new Zoom G2.1u is giving me fantastic results live. I personally like the edgy, cold chainsaw buzz of diodes cooking as opposed to tubes.

The addition of a more clean signal in your tone makes total sense to me these days. Clean is always more percussive and punchy along with the guitars natural unaltered harmonic overtones. Giving it just enough push to go into the grind of overdrive lets you hit harder, louder and dynamics are WAY better.
didnt the guy in Rush use a Galien Krueger?
I believe he used a hughes and kettner.
LTD FX260 [Dist/Jazz] [9s, E/Drop D]
LTD H500 [Dist/Jazz] [9s, D/Drop C]
LTD H1001 [81/85] [10s, C#/Drop B]
GCB-95 [mod soon]
Boss SD-1 [mod soon]
Fryette Sig:X [soon]
Ampeg V412 [Emi Governor/MOW]
Randall RS412LB [Emi Super V]
DR strings
Cpt Matt Sparrow
Mass Poster
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:57 am

Post by Cpt Matt Sparrow »

To go back to original question I am with you Rob. I too prefer clean sound.
I like the way you can have dynamics with louds and softs.

My favouritetype of distortion is the clean just crossing into distortion tone. Maybe like Brian Setzer or Eric Clapton Blues Breaker tone.

I do love though just putting my Randy backing tracks on and going into my JSX ultra channel and just having some heavy fun :D
Having a break from online activity for a while to concentrate on music. Please email if you need to get in touch. Matt
User avatar
The Flying Dutchman
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3681
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 4:03 pm
Location: Gotham City

Re: Clean vs. Dirty

Post by The Flying Dutchman »

rice_pudding wrote:I like distorted tones too but i always find that something about them dissapoints me. ....... If i use distortion i always end up tweaking it but its never perfect.
I felt like that for years till I tried this:

Image

Think about this: Eddie, Randy, Malmsteen, Schenker, Gary Moore and countless of others in the seventies and early eighties used them and all had great tones! That's no coincidence. I wished somebody gave me this advice 20 years ago, it would probably save me a 2 years permanent holiday on a subtropic island. No kidding.... But you get this advice now from Mr. Dutchman for free! :D
Stiltzkin
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2079
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:29 am
Location: Sweden

Post by Stiltzkin »

hmm ...

I've set the channel volume on the Randall at full
and then control it by the master volume. Backed
of the gain completely and EQ'd the amp with hardly
no bass at all. As my Dean is mostly mahogany
I'd like to think that the guitar provides the bass 8)

Add the Cat's Eye box and the Dean with the EMG 85
in bridge position and you're good to go :twisted:
rice_pudding
Mass Poster
Posts: 1734
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:49 pm
Location: UK

Post by rice_pudding »

LordThurisaz wrote:
rice_pudding wrote:
McLowery wrote:I have done the same thing over the years. I used to crank the preamp gain all the way and slowly but surely it's backed down to about 55-60% over the years. I don't play through tube amps, never have, and the only solid state amp I have found that gives nice power section saturation is my Gallien Krueger 250ML, It gets grittier as the volume goes up, in a nice sounding overdrive. All my other amps I am forced to use the pre-amp gain stages. (I love my Randall RG100es crunch, nothing is similar) and my new Zoom G2.1u is giving me fantastic results live. I personally like the edgy, cold chainsaw buzz of diodes cooking as opposed to tubes.

The addition of a more clean signal in your tone makes total sense to me these days. Clean is always more percussive and punchy along with the guitars natural unaltered harmonic overtones. Giving it just enough push to go into the grind of overdrive lets you hit harder, louder and dynamics are WAY better.
didnt the guy in Rush use a Galien Krueger?
I believe he used a hughes and kettner.
i think he used a galien krueger in the 80s i will check it out...

P.S. im surprised at how many people here prefer a clean tone...interesting :idea:
LordThurisaz
Cool Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:05 pm

Post by LordThurisaz »

Stiltzkin wrote:hmm ...

I've set the channel volume on the Randall at full
and then control it by the master volume. Backed
of the gain completely and EQ'd the amp with hardly
no bass at all. As my Dean is mostly mahogany
I'd like to think that the guitar provides the bass 8)

Add the Cat's Eye box and the Dean with the EMG 85
in bridge position and you're good to go :twisted:
That's a pretty nifty and clever idea. This would kinda work similar to EVH's variac used to lower the headroom of his Marshall, thus causing more tube saturation. My personal suggestion though would be to set the chan volume to about 7 or 8, then set the dist really low, like .5-2, and then adjust the master volume with the guitar at full bore to your personal ideal tone. This way, you can roll your guitar controls back or switch pickups rather than changing settings a lot.
LTD FX260 [Dist/Jazz] [9s, E/Drop D]
LTD H500 [Dist/Jazz] [9s, D/Drop C]
LTD H1001 [81/85] [10s, C#/Drop B]
GCB-95 [mod soon]
Boss SD-1 [mod soon]
Fryette Sig:X [soon]
Ampeg V412 [Emi Governor/MOW]
Randall RS412LB [Emi Super V]
DR strings
Stiltzkin
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2079
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:29 am
Location: Sweden

Post by Stiltzkin »

i still like it cranked though.

cranked and trebly 8)
LordThurisaz
Cool Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:05 pm

Post by LordThurisaz »

That's cool, just thought I'd suggest a different perspective you may not've thought of yet.

My personally tone is a high end distortion, with a nice full, solid eq job, kinda like Gilbert, but with a little more mids, probably around Schenker territory. Plus the DOD250 I use gives a slight Yngwie tone to the british high gain thing that's happening. Kinda the typical 80s shred tone, but with a nicer high-end/presence, and a fluid bass (which means it sounds heavy, but it doesn't rumble), and a 70s penchant for MORE MIDS! I have em at about 7-8 depending on the day. sometimes 6. If need be, I can adjust the guitar's tone and not even get a muddy tone at 0. Pretty cool.
LTD FX260 [Dist/Jazz] [9s, E/Drop D]
LTD H500 [Dist/Jazz] [9s, D/Drop C]
LTD H1001 [81/85] [10s, C#/Drop B]
GCB-95 [mod soon]
Boss SD-1 [mod soon]
Fryette Sig:X [soon]
Ampeg V412 [Emi Governor/MOW]
Randall RS412LB [Emi Super V]
DR strings
Cpt Matt Sparrow
Mass Poster
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:57 am

Post by Cpt Matt Sparrow »

I used to have to use my Boss EQ, MD ii Distortion pedal and constantly mess around.

Since we got the JSX Head it has put those 2 out of business for good. 8)

Matt
Having a break from online activity for a while to concentrate on music. Please email if you need to get in touch. Matt
Post Reply