New Sarzo interview 2012

Talk about other music and musicians.

Moderators: Randy Perry, The Flying Dutchman, Stiltzkin, skezza, Trigger

rokket
Madman
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:45 am

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by rokket »

Tito wrote:JESUS CHRIST IS ARGUING EACH OTHER'S POINT OF VIEW GONNA CHANGE ANYTHING!!??BOB GOT SCREWED, WORKED WITH OZZY AFTER THE 2 ALBUMS, LOST THE LAST CASE, SHARON CUT LEE AND BOBS TRACKS ETC..BOBS WRITING A BOOK AND NEEDS ALL THE PUBLICITY HE CAN GET FOR WHENEVER IT GETS RELEASED...HE KEEPS TELLING THE SAME STORY OVER AND OVER AGAIN..OK WHAT THE HELL IS GONNA COME OUT OF CHEERLEADING FOR THE OPPOSITE TEAM?NOTHING!!!NO FOOTAGE NO NEW AUDIO NOTHIN!!!JUST A THOUGHT..
It's all pointless really....whats done is done. The blame doesn't sit squarely with Don, yes he did offer to help in the second case, then signed a bogus affidavit on Sharon's suggestion saying he was offered a bribe. The man's dead, no point in just saying it was his fault. Why was there a second court case in the first place? not because of anything Don did or didn't do, but because after winning the first case against Don, which Sharon and Ozzy helped with, aside from the money, which Bob and Lee got, Sharon (because she's now in control) was suppose to continue to pay forth coming royalties, which she never did. Is that Don's fault she didn't do the right thing, no. So since 1983, Sharon and Ozzy have pocketed Bob and Lee's royalties, hardly Don's doing.
User avatar
GUITARIDOL5682
Mass Poster
Posts: 4756
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:42 pm

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by GUITARIDOL5682 »

shred1 wrote: Congratulations, you failed to address any of my points. Again, just another chorus about how evil Sharon is, in broad, unfocused strokes.
Yeah because you keep going round in circles, change the record. How come everyone can see the way 'The Evil one' operates she's Don Arden with tits. Shrewd business woman whatever she's stopped shit loads of RR related things happening.
Sky
Madman
Posts: 414
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:43 am

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by Sky »

Tito wrote:JESUS CHRIST IS ARGUING EACH OTHER'S POINT OF VIEW GONNA CHANGE ANYTHING!!??BOB GOT SCREWED, WORKED WITH OZZY AFTER THE 2 ALBUMS, LOST THE LAST CASE, SHARON CUT LEE AND BOBS TRACKS ETC..BOBS WRITING A BOOK AND NEEDS ALL THE PUBLICITY HE CAN GET FOR WHENEVER IT GETS RELEASED...HE KEEPS TELLING THE SAME STORY OVER AND OVER AGAIN..OK WHAT THE HELL IS GONNA COME OUT OF CHEERLEADING FOR THE OPPOSITE TEAM?NOTHING!!!NO FOOTAGE NO NEW AUDIO NOTHIN!!!JUST A THOUGHT..
Maybe the reason that Bob keeps telling the story over and over is because people keep asking him the same bleedin' questions!
It might help if you get the timeline straight. You seem to think that the argument between Bob and the Osbournes has been going on for 30 years. It began at the end of the 90s when Bob discovered that they were pocketing his performance royalties NOT in 1981. Of course Bob was pissed off at being fired along with Lee, it's obvious that he loved that band, but within weeks Sharon was in touch with Bob asking him to come back, it wasn't Bob who had to eat humble pie. The main thing that you overlook is that Ozzy and Bob were FRIENDS, they enjoyed each others company before and after 1981. It wasn't just the business arrangement that the Osbournes now portray, they all socialised until Bob found out that they been been receiving his and Lee's performance royalties and it was at that time that the animosity began and the 2002 lawsuit came about. As for the result, most of us get that the statute of limitations came into play, Bob and Lee were denied a hearing, end of story. Yes Don 'flipped' in 2001, by then he was an old man with Alzheimer's who knew that his days were numbered and he wanted to see the grandchildren that Sharon had never allowed him to see. Sharon used her kids as she uses everything and everyone in this life... As objects to achieve her aims.
"Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away." - Elvis Presley
User avatar
RRFan4Ever
Madman
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:09 pm

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by RRFan4Ever »

$haron is just her dad with tits and a sour attitude to match.

I had a hearty chuckle- tits and a sour attitude lol! anyways, didn't the O's also remaster/reissue other ambums, such as those with Jake E Lee? I doubt that she really went 15 or 20 years (depending upon what source and which account) without talking to him. It's a typical ploy for those facing criminal or civil charges to use those words to supposedly avoid contact with someone in particular while that person, or someone close to them so as to avoid penalty or repercussion.
They got what they wanted, the case thrown out. Anyone who is familar with the so-called justice system knows that it's not hard to shake off a civil action.

I think DA and SO played games with many on so many levels to cut people out of what is rightfully theirs that this is not just exclusive to Bob, but several other bands that have experienced her charm and subsequent wrath. It's not alleged by Bob and Bob alone, it's out there on the world wide web for one to peruse and find other accounts of her deceit. Bob gave O some of O's best work and still gets shit on, I believe that he is entitled to his dues.
If someone thinks that love and peace is a cliche that must have been left behind in the Sixties, that's his problem. Love and peace are eternal. John Lennon
User avatar
shred1
Madman
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:24 am

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by shred1 »

It's all pointless really....whats done is done.
Then why did you start this thread in the first place? Seriously.
User avatar
GUITARIDOL5682
Mass Poster
Posts: 4756
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:42 pm

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by GUITARIDOL5682 »

shred1 wrote:
It's all pointless really....whats done is done.
Then why did you start this thread in the first place? Seriously.
So yourself, me and Rokket could stretch the thread out for 8 pages...Have you decided to wave the white flag. :lol: :wink:
rokket
Madman
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:45 am

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by rokket »

GUITARIDOL5682 wrote:
shred1 wrote:
It's all pointless really....whats done is done.
Then why did you start this thread in the first place? Seriously.
So yourself, me and Rokket could stretch the thread out for 8 pages...Have you decided to wave the white flag. :lol: :wink:
I'm sure we could break a record and go for 100's of pages......lol
User avatar
shred1
Madman
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:24 am

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by shred1 »

Don't go fucking nit picking and causing BS..FFS. :roll:
I didn't start this thread.

No reason to wave a white flag either.

cheers
User avatar
GUITARIDOL5682
Mass Poster
Posts: 4756
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:42 pm

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by GUITARIDOL5682 »

shred1 wrote:
Don't go fucking nit picking and causing BS..FFS. :roll:
I didn't start this thread.

No reason to wave a white flag either.

cheers
Well if we are going to go digging up old dirt from 7 pages back :roll: The thread started with a Rudy Sarzo interview. You posted up a link to BD's interview then the BD mud bucket came out. You with your sly ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz I wonder what shit he's got to say etc comment. Don't come on the board slagging people and nit picking mate and kicking up the dust. If you don't like the guy and the way he does shit leave it alone. Or do you want to start another fight :twisted: Because i can take down the flag and come in charging with all guns mate...
User avatar
shred1
Madman
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:24 am

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by shred1 »

Is that a threat Idol?
I dont' have to bring up Bob, he brings this up himself, about every 2 months.

But, if rokket wants to rip Rudy Sarzo, he is free game, cause, well, YOU said so, and well, his opinion is similar to yours.
Are you the gatekeeper here? You are certainly not the voice of reason.

The thread WAS about rokket's claim that Rudy is misleading people about the crash. A ridiculous thread starter.
You gave him shit yourself....look at your own response, then defend the guy.
You say the interview is old news - it is, but the interview is new. Then you flip and defend it. Where do you really stand Idol?

If Bob wants to make his business PUBLIC, he should expect some public opinion.

I have every right to have an opinion on this. Maybe if you don't like it, you should leave it alone.

Old dirt? That was last week, FFS.

Bring your guns if you must, Idol.
Paul Wolfe
Mass Poster
Posts: 5272
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:19 am

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by Paul Wolfe »

For fuck's sake Shred, let it go. You are a newcomer to this little piece of the 'net, why not just drop this and move on? Is it worth pissing off everyone until you get kicked out of the forum?

I like a good argument as well as anyone, but this one has grown old and personal attacks just make things bad all the way around.
rokket
Madman
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:45 am

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by rokket »

Let's just leave it all alone and move onto something else.............!!!
Last edited by rokket on Tue Feb 07, 2012 6:08 am, edited 2 times in total.
rokket
Madman
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:45 am

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by rokket »

"For Fucks's Sake Shred1"......I thought Bob's book title was "For Fact's Sake!"...........I'm wrong again.......DOH...!!!
User avatar
shred1
Madman
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:24 am

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by shred1 »

Hey rokket, why don't you fess up to kicking up this hornets nest, then shut your pie hole.
Clown. Have some more Kool Aid.
rokket
Madman
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:45 am

Re: New Sarzo interview 2012

Post by rokket »

shred1 wrote:Hey rokket, why don't you fess up to kicking up this hornets nest, then shut your pie hole.
Clown. Have some more Kool Aid.
Like I said, let's just leave it.
Post Reply