I'm no luthier and i thought the same, the V' angle looks very tight ?. It could be the angle the photo was taking at ?.
What's this smart arse in every room comment ?.
CONCORD IS READY FOR ORDER
Moderators: Randy Perry, The Flying Dutchman, Stiltzkin, skezza, Trigger
-
GUITARIDOL5682
- Mass Poster
- Posts: 4761
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:42 pm
-
dannyahansen
- Mass Poster
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 11:30 pm
- Location: utah, usa
Re: CONCORD IS READY FOR ORDER
I don't think the body looks wide enough. The body looks too small. Other than that the guitar does look nice.Paul Wolfe wrote:the crush wrote:the body looks off to me does not seem to look right but could be wrong what does everyone else think
Very first thought I had was, "The v angles are wrong."
-
Cryptic Night
- Mass Poster
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 7:39 am
- Location: My House
Re: CONCORD IS READY FOR ORDER
The bodies are slightly different (The angles on these two are about the same, picture wise)
But overall, it is still a rather nice looking guitar.
Like the lunar and solar lights, humanity's unaligned, undefined.
-
Paul Wolfe
- Mass Poster
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:19 am
Re: CONCORD IS READY FOR ORDER
Maybe that's what looks 'off', the width. Something looks off but, yes, it looks nice.dannyahansen wrote:I don't think the body looks wide enough. The body looks too small. Other than that the guitar does look nice.