Grammar check !
Moderators: Randy Perry, The Flying Dutchman, Stiltzkin, skezza, Trigger
Grammar check !
Does anybody know if there's any reason to why people
write "would/could/should of" instead of "would/could/should have" ?
write "would/could/should of" instead of "would/could/should have" ?
Re: Grammar check !
xx123456
Last edited by Alex on Sun Jul 23, 2017 11:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Mass Poster
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:19 am
Re: Grammar check !
I'd say it reverts to the conjunctions should've, could've and would've - which come from should have, could have and would have. These are not necessarily 'proper' use of the English language, but that'd be me explanation to this here conundrum.
Re: Grammar check !
hey paul good to see you posting again man!!!hope your doing well dude!!!!!
-
- Mass Poster
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:19 am
Re: Grammar check !
Tito, thanks for the warm welcome... all is well here.
I'd like to correct my earlier post - the proper word is 'contraction' not 'conjunction' - don't know what I was thinking.
I'd like to correct my earlier post - the proper word is 'contraction' not 'conjunction' - don't know what I was thinking.
Re: Grammar check !
xx123456
Last edited by Alex on Sun Jul 23, 2017 11:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Mass Poster
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:19 am
Re: Grammar check !
Thanks Alex
-
- Cool Member
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:18 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Grammar check !
the ones that bug me are the uses of-
they're,there,& their
or..
to,too,two.
they're,there,& their
or..
to,too,two.
-
- Cool Member
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 1:51 am
Re: Grammar check !
Nuclear vs nucular always makes me giggle. It's scary how many important, powerful, and supposedly educated people do that.
Re: Grammar check !
you know what's funny? even people with english as their mothertongue does this.
are they not aware?
are they not aware?

Re: Grammar check !
The following are nonsensical yet are used a lot by media:
1-IRREGARDLESS
2-NEAR-MISS
1-IRREGARDLESS
2-NEAR-MISS
How to tell a real RR signature: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=726&start=120
Re: Grammar check !
what's the correct term then ?oth wrote:The following are nonsensical yet are used a lot by media:
1-IRREGARDLESS
2-NEAR-MISS
you know, it's only at TK and here I've seen this happening

-
- Mass Poster
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:19 am
Re: Grammar check !
suposably instead of supposedly bugs the crap out of me!
Of course people speaking in text is insane to, I mean saying, "WTF" or "IDK" istead of saying the words? In a text it's one thing, but when you are actually talking?
Of course people speaking in text is insane to, I mean saying, "WTF" or "IDK" istead of saying the words? In a text it's one thing, but when you are actually talking?
Re: Grammar check !
ouch, that's a bit overkillPaul Wolfe wrote:Of course people speaking in text is insane to, I mean saying, "WTF" or "IDK" istead of saying the words? In a text it's one thing, but when you are actually talking?

-
- Mass Poster
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:49 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Grammar check !
I do know a couple of people who say 'LOL' and 'ROFL'Stiltzkin wrote:ouch, that's a bit overkillPaul Wolfe wrote:Of course people speaking in text is insane to, I mean saying, "WTF" or "IDK" istead of saying the words? In a text it's one thing, but when you are actually talking?

Rob
www.rstorey.co.uk