What?! Palm readers are fake!?! I don't believe it.oth wrote:...as bad as palm readers.

Moderators: Randy Perry, The Flying Dutchman, Stiltzkin, skezza, Trigger
What?! Palm readers are fake!?! I don't believe it.oth wrote:...as bad as palm readers.
Your so negative and dont trust no one, do you !!..oth wrote:GUITARIDOL5682 wrote:Not with the genuine autograph dealers. They have the providence of the item dated and authenticated. One site which comes to mind is the UACC Universal Autograph Collectors Club. I have had these recommended to me from collectors and they always provide a COA with every item purchased. Like i mentioned, anyone can print one up and say any old crap to convince the buyer. If your not sure about any signatures, don't buy them.dasboot wrote:A COA is usually a sure sign that it is a fake.
According to this ebay seller this aint true.So I did a google search on psa/dna and they indeed are a scam-I was totally surprised but shouldnt have been.So i did a uacc search and pretty lame also.Then i remember you mentioning in a thread a name of guy and so i checked out the old threads and found roger epperson and this guy,GI,is a fraud also.The whole authenticating industry is a farce.There are no rules or facts.Anybody can call themselves a genuine autograph business or association.Its a joke.Like a fraternity of loser wannabe's-as bad as palm readers.
Yeah if it was being scrutinised under a microscope, i see your point. But people like Bob Daisley, he has never changed his style and he signs the very same signature today.axeman_12656 wrote: No one signs their name the same every single time.