burying the hatchet

Talk about Randy Rhoads here.

Moderators: Randy Perry, The Flying Dutchman, Stiltzkin, skezza, Trigger

shawn
Cool Member
Posts: 275
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:06 pm

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by shawn »

axeman_12656 wrote:A very valued member of this board, a good friend of mine, told me Bob asked for a rediculas amount of money for them. NOT royalties, a rediculas amount of money for the tapes. At that point it was just dropped.
cableguyxx wrote:maybe he asked for 50K?
bwahahaha, nice.
User avatar
axeman_12656
Mass Poster
Posts: 505
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 4:32 am
Location: Pikeville, KY
Contact:

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by axeman_12656 »

cableguyxx wrote:maybe he asked for 50K? :P :lol:
50K X 2 lol
Live Life Stronger Than Death
Sky
Madman
Posts: 414
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:43 am

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by Sky »

axeman_12656 wrote:
sytharnia wrote:this is one of the best trolling I have seen here....well done axeman
Just making conversation.

But I do stand by my opinion.... My opinion is they (The O's and Bob) are both to blame. They both have their own set of faults. Bob and Lee should have received a lot of things (Money, credits, awards) that they have been denied. At the same time I would really love to know how much Bob is asking for the tapes. A very valued member of this board, a good friend of mine, told me Bob asked for a rediculas amount of money for them. NOT royalties, a rediculas amount of money for the tapes. At that point it was just dropped.
I believe he asked for royalties and for the tapes to be released in their uncut state so that everyone would know exactly who did what... Think the latter would worry the Osbournes far more than any sum of money.
"Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away." - Elvis Presley
User avatar
shred1
Madman
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:24 am

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by shred1 »

I don't think there is any worry on the Osbourne's part.
Paul Wolfe
Mass Poster
Posts: 5272
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:19 am

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by Paul Wolfe »

Maybe Bob's tapes weren't the quality he claims?
User avatar
shred1
Madman
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:24 am

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by shred1 »

Perhaps the record company and/or Sharon believe the number asked for isn't in line with projected sales/profits. That is speculation on my part.
I think we can agree this would not be a million selling release - it is low quality 'jam' snippets. A limited demographic for sure. A nice add on for something more 'official'.

Let me put it this way..... the most popular RR facebook page has almost 60,000 followers. Out of those who took the time to like that page, how many would purchase a release like this? Even 100% still only adds up to 60,000 units. See above.

Ditto this formula for Bob's book.
rokket
Madman
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:45 am

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by rokket »

axeman_12656 wrote:
sytharnia wrote:this is one of the best trolling I have seen here....well done axeman
Just making conversation.

But I do stand by my opinion.... My opinion is they (The O's and Bob) are both to blame. They both have their own set of faults. Bob and Lee should have received a lot of things (Money, credits, awards) that they have been denied. At the same time I would really love to know how much Bob is asking for the tapes. A very valued member of this board, a good friend of mine, told me Bob asked for a rediculas amount of money for them. NOT royalties, a rediculas amount of money for the tapes. At that point it was just dropped.
Bob didn't ask for a sale amount, because he never wanted and still doesn't want to sell them. What he asked for were royalties. That argument aside, Bob still wants to release them himself, but the Osbourne's WILL NOT LET HIM. Who's fault exactly then is it, that we may never get to hear these recordings? It's the Osbourne's way or NO WAY
User avatar
hansolo
Mass Poster
Posts: 1027
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:05 am

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by hansolo »

"Lee and I haven't been contacted." - Sounds like they were not contacted. I'm going out on a limb and say there was no offer. If there was then he would of said something like, "We were offered $$ but it was peanuts." I'm thinking they weren't even consulted. Once again management doesn't give a crap about the working class/the ones who made the product!
User avatar
shred1
Madman
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:24 am

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by shred1 »

BraveWords.com: You've mentioned that you have rehearsal tapes and writing tapes and other historical audio documents of those years. Can those be released?

Bob Daisley: "It's a legal issue with somebody's performance. You have to get them to sign off on their performance. I have Ozzy singing and Randy playing and I have to say, fans of that music would love this stuff. Even though they are not of studio quality, it's not bad. I went to my manager who went to their representative, and told them I had all of these recordings of rehearsals, writing sessions, songs that no one has heard, sections that did not get used, tonnes of stuff. For the 30th anniversary, why not do a deal and release all this stuff? But they didn't want to do it. All Sharon wanted to do was to buy everything for a measly sum and then release it. I said, 'no way, this stuff's gold. You either do it my way, meaning I get a royalty this time, or no deal.' But I have should have always got a royalty. They wouldn't do it. I said, 'I am not handing it over to you to make a fortune.' The main reason was they could have edited it, taken us out of it again or pieced it together and go about rewriting history once again. Ozzy and Randy did everything is what they will have you believe. It's too bad this unreleased stuff that I have has been unheard by anyone for 30 years."

'We were not consulted' - bullsh**.

I am gonna add that the Osbournes are not the only point of negotiation with regards to his 'holy grail' tapes. The Rhoads estate would have to approve them too - Delores, Kelle etc.

Mrs. Rhoads, judging by past decisions, isn't going to let these 'jam tapes' out, and 'blaming' the Osbournes here is, at best, only half the story.
Sky
Madman
Posts: 414
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:43 am

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by Sky »

shred1 wrote:BraveWords.com: You've mentioned that you have rehearsal tapes and writing tapes and other historical audio documents of those years. Can those be released?

Bob Daisley: "It's a legal issue with somebody's performance. You have to get them to sign off on their performance. I have Ozzy singing and Randy playing and I have to say, fans of that music would love this stuff. Even though they are not of studio quality, it's not bad. I went to my manager who went to their representative, and told them I had all of these recordings of rehearsals, writing sessions, songs that no one has heard, sections that did not get used, tonnes of stuff. For the 30th anniversary, why not do a deal and release all this stuff? But they didn't want to do it. All Sharon wanted to do was to buy everything for a measly sum and then release it. I said, 'no way, this stuff's gold. You either do it my way, meaning I get a royalty this time, or no deal.' But I have should have always got a royalty. They wouldn't do it. I said, 'I am not handing it over to you to make a fortune.' The main reason was they could have edited it, taken us out of it again or pieced it together and go about rewriting history once again. Ozzy and Randy did everything is what they will have you believe. It's too bad this unreleased stuff that I have has been unheard by anyone for 30 years."
Thanks for posting. I'd forgotten that Bob's manager met with the Osbourne's representative more than a year before Sharon announced they were doing a 30th Anniversary edition. Sharon wanted to do a buy out which would give her complete control of the tapes. Bob and Lee were hardly acknowledged in the box set, there's no doubt Sharon would've cut the tapes to pieces to sell her version of events. In my opinion, Bob was right to insist on getting only a royalty and retaining ownership of the tapes. Hopefully he'll find a way of releasing his tapes in their entirety and we'll get to hear what really went on. I totally believe that neither Bob nor Lee were consulted about what material was going to be released, there's no communication between them and the Osbournes.
"Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away." - Elvis Presley
User avatar
shred1
Madman
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:24 am

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by shred1 »

Acknowledged. No. Consulted. Yes.

Bob has NO exclusive right to release this 'jam' stuff - especially when its inherent value is the presence of Randy Rhoads. Not Bob.

Bob is giving away his bass tracks on his website. He knows without Randy on them, they have no real monetary value.

Its all in my book, mate!
rokket
Madman
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:45 am

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by rokket »

shred1 wrote:Acknowledged. No. Consulted. Yes.

Bob has NO exclusive right to release this 'jam' stuff - especially when its inherent value is the presence of Randy Rhoads. Not Bob.

Bob is giving away his bass tracks on his website. He knows without Randy on them, they have no real monetary value.

Its all in my book, mate!
Maybe he has the tracks up because he can. It's his performance. He's allowed too. The reason he can't release the Grail Tapes is because it's not just him on those tapes, even if he wanted to release them for free, he's not allowed too without permission from every person on those tapes.

Saying his bass playing has no monetary value is a bit far fetched. There are a lot of bassists out there who would disagree with you.
User avatar
shred1
Madman
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:24 am

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by shred1 »

I wrote that the bass tracks on Bob's site have no monetary value. They don't.
Don't twist my words, please.

And as to the tapes - you are correct - he can't release them. So why did he bring them up?
To further his agenda, in my opinion, and in this case, try and make the Osbournes look like the villians.
Notice he didn't mention how the Rhoads estate feels about these tapes, and they need to approve them too.

Again, I think, more so than ever, that Bob is trading on someone else's glory.

As far as Bob's storytelling...... the sin of omission is the same as lying.
rokket
Madman
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:45 am

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by rokket »

shred1 wrote:I wrote that the bass tracks on Bob's site have no monetary value. They don't.
Don't twist my words, please.

And as to the tapes - you are correct - he can't release them. So why did he bring them up?
To further his agenda, in my opinion, and in this case, try and make the Osbournes look like the villians.
Notice he didn't mention how the Rhoads estate feels about these tapes, and they need to approve them too.

Again, I think, more so than ever, that Bob is trading on someone else's glory.

As far as Bob's storytelling...... the sin of omission is the same as lying.
True, I said bass playing, should have said bass tracks. If the only famous band Bob had been in was Blizzard Of Ozz, then I would agree, he may be trading on someone elses glory, but thats not the case. If it were, he could have and probably would have released several books by now titled, "My Time With Randy Rhoads, Volume 1-5" and made a small fortune. Your statement simply doesn't ring true.

On another subject, should I post the prototype Bob Daisley Signature series bass photos and info on here, before it is officially released??? Just checking before hand. Might be a few bassists interested.............??????
User avatar
shred1
Madman
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:24 am

Re: burying the hatchet

Post by shred1 »

He is trying to release Volume 1 right now!
Post Reply