It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 2:15 am


Post a new topicPost a reply Page 2 of 2   [ 27 posts ]
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:46 am 
Junior Member

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:43 am
Posts: 17
I thought the acoustic version of "Afterglow" was pretty cool. When that CD came out, I had never heard any QR with Randy, but since then I have listened to a bunch of stuff and like it all. I still can't believe they didn't get a deal after Van Halen broke.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 3:50 am 
Junior Member

Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:32 am
Posts: 16
I agree, it's surprising they did not get a record deal.

My thought on the RR Years CD is that I think Randy would have approved of most of the changes- the changes in sound/mixes definitely draw more attention to what he is playing. There were some changes to lyrics/song structure on songs that were unexpected ("Trouble" had a quite a bit of changes), but I think most were for the better.

And yes I would agree many, many albums are doctored, I'm sure there were production decisions made on the Ozzy albums Randy may not have been thrilled with (Not being able to do the solo he wanted to do on "Little Dolls" for example).

Kevin had said Randy felt Kevin was his best guitar critic, and with Randy not being here I think Kevin was just the right person to decide on the changes to make.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: i agree with Stiltzkin
PostPosted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 2:42 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:39 am
Posts: 51
Location: Maryland
i agree with Stiltzkin
Randy was so precise that he could seemsily doubletrack anything he played for a maxium sonic density

he could have played some parts with different guitars to experement with sounds.

plus the beginning to afterglow is acoustic, there was probially a unreleased version that was acoustic that ended up on the years album

_________________
Eric Hickman

From Obsecurity to Eternity
1956-1982


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: i agree with Stiltzkin
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:31 pm 
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 12:57 pm
Posts: 19
[quote="Rhoads10"]i agree with Stiltzkin
Randy was so precise that he could seemsily doubletrack anything he played for a maxium sonic density

he could have played some parts with different guitars to experement with sounds.

plus the beginning to afterglow is acoustic, there was probially a unreleased version that was acoustic that ended up on the years album[/quote]

i agree with rhoads10


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 2:41 pm 
Mass Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 502
That QR - The RR Years is a cool recording. It sounds great to me. I still want to get QR I and QR II.

_________________
Work Sucks!! Thats why I am on here reading posts!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 3:46 pm 
Mass Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 3:44 pm
Posts: 803
Location: ------>
:arrow:


Last edited by cableguyxx on Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 3:48 pm 
Mass Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 502
cableguyxx wrote:
Zakk Daniels wrote:
That QR - The RR Years is a cool recording. It sounds great to me. I still want to get QR I and QR II.
The original LP's can be found on EBAY now and then. QR II is pretty common find for less then $75, sometimes much less. QR I on the hand, I've seen for more than $400, depending on who's bidding at the time. Not seen one go for less than $100 in a very long time. Someone sells a nice bootleg CD on there, both on one CD. They claim it's legit, but it's still a boot. If you're just wanting to download the LP's, I have them hosted, courtesy of Kevin Dubrow, here:

http://www.eternalrandyrhoads.com/audio.html


WOW!! Thanks man. Very Cool!! :D

_________________
Work Sucks!! Thats why I am on here reading posts!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 3:55 pm 
Mass Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 3:44 pm
Posts: 803
Location: ------>
:arrow:


Last edited by cableguyxx on Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2007 2:20 pm 
Mass Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 4163
I know the discussion regarding Kevin "tweaking" the recordings has gone on for a long time, but I thought I'd stir it up a bit!

I was listening to Laughing Gas from that CD yesterday and - in my opinion - that is the worst version of the solo I've heard. Probably because two seperate solos were pieced together. I've listened to the solos on the videos repeatedly and prefer them by far. The CD version has pristine sound, but I just don't think the solo sounds so great.

Any thoughts?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:20 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 6:50 pm
Posts: 80
Location: New York, NY
You can download QR I and II in their entirety on mp3sugar.com. Great site, supposedly legal and songs are only $.18. You have to pay a minimum of $20 and draw from your balance when you download, however albums are only like $1.83 each.

_________________
Life's a stage and we're all in the cast.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:45 pm 
Cool Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:47 pm
Posts: 131
Location: Maryland
Paul Wolfe wrote:
I know the discussion regarding Kevin "tweaking" the recordings has gone on for a long time, but I thought I'd stir it up a bit!

I was listening to Laughing Gas from that CD yesterday and - in my opinion - that is the worst version of the solo I've heard. Probably because two seperate solos were pieced together. I've listened to the solos on the videos repeatedly and prefer them by far. The CD version has pristine sound, but I just don't think the solo sounds so great.

Any thoughts?
Agreed. The two seperate solos doesn't sound good because of the tone. I wish Kevin used the original Solo (Even with Drew's bass drums kicking in the background) but I still enjoy it alot.

The album overrall rocks. Picking Up The Pieces is my favorite out of all of them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:23 am 
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:17 am
Posts: 85
Location: La Mirada,CA
Paul Wolfe wrote:
I know the discussion regarding Kevin "tweaking" the recordings has gone on for a long time, but I thought I'd stir it up a bit!

I was listening to Laughing Gas from that CD yesterday and - in my opinion - that is the worst version of the solo I've heard. Probably because two seperate solos were pieced together. I've listened to the solos on the videos repeatedly and prefer them by far. The CD version has pristine sound, but I just don't think the solo sounds so great.

Any thoughts?


it sounds just like the suicide solution on the Tribute album, i know its the laughing gas solo, but i like the one on Tribute better because it gets to the point IMO.

_________________
Goodbye to romance, yeah
Goodbye to friends,
Goodbye to all the Past
I guess that we'll meet
We'll meet in the end


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post a new topicPost a reply Page 2 of 2   [ 27 posts ]
Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
twilightBB Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net