Ozzy Osbourne or Heaven and Hell?
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 7:01 pm
Having seen both Ozzy and Heaven and Hell twice this year I was just thinking about who was the better live act. Back in the early 80's there was all this Ozzy V Dio thingy going on, Ozzy rules and Dio drules and all that bollocks. It was often quite funny listening to two sets of arguments. I've got to say Ozzy edged it for me then. Fast forward over 25 years and things are a bit different now. Although I still really enjoyed seeing Ozzy in concert during the summer, it is quite obvious he's not the singer or performer that he was back then. Heaven and Hell on the other hand have only improved with age, as musicians they were awesome, and Dio's vocals sounded as strong, if not stronger than ever, I wish the same could be said for Ozzy. Having said that, I think the Ozzy concerts were also great, he puts in a lot of effort and seems genuinly pleased to be up there, and the atmophere was second to none, far better than Heaven and Hell, but then again, Ozzy only played 2 UK dates, Heaven and Hell played 11, so it's obvious the Ozzy dates were going to be packed. whereas Heavena nd Hell playing so many Arena size venues were going to struggle.
I could go on and on, but enough of me waffling, I enjoyed both sets of concerts, and even though I'm more of an Ozzy fan than a Dio fan, Heaven and Hell were the better live act IMO.
Any thoughts?
I could go on and on, but enough of me waffling, I enjoyed both sets of concerts, and even though I'm more of an Ozzy fan than a Dio fan, Heaven and Hell were the better live act IMO.
Any thoughts?