Page 1 of 1
UGLY
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 11:48 pm
by Paul Wolfe
I just don't care for Zakk's taste in guitars.
Re: UGLY
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:45 am
by sytharnia
not hard to guess why its on sale....wheres the vomitcon

Re: UGLY
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:41 pm
by Paul Wolfe
Y'know, Zakk loved Randy, right? So why can't he catch on to the fact that Randy only had one polka-dot guitar?
Re: UGLY
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 8:05 pm
by kamalayka
Zakk must've been blackmailing somebody at Gibson to get that thing built.
Re: UGLY
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:25 pm
by Stiltzkin
kamalayka wrote:Zakk must've been blackmailing somebody at Gibson to get that thing built.
my guess is that he's one of Gibsons bigger endorsees and can have them built pretty much what he want

Re: UGLY
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
by rhoads56
He says he's sober. Nope, he's still drunk....
Re: UGLY
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 1:31 am
by Paul Wolfe
Re: UGLY
Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:55 am
by randy will never die
I know people hate zakks guitar designs but I LOVE zakks maple fretboard Les Paul Vertigo
You don't see zakk rocking a maple fretboard that often
Re: UGLY
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:18 am
by Paul Wolfe
I think a Les Paul with a maple fretboard and pearl inlays looks fantastic, not to into the Zak paint jobs, though.
Re: UGLY
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:33 pm
by dannyahansen
There is a reason the Moderne was never released. Its freaking ugly. I would never ever buy this.
Re: UGLY
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 11:35 pm
by randy will never die
Wish gibson would try the maple neck Paul's again
If they are priced wright I get 1
Re: UGLY
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:01 pm
by Paul Wolfe
While we're talking ugly, I'd have to say the Paul Stanley Washburn guitars rank up there with the Zakk Moderne. The headstock shape on the 2nd one is the only remotely cool part of either guitar in my humble opinion.

Re: UGLY
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 2:32 am
by randy will never die
Wish Paul would go back to his old ice man
Miss looking at that beauty