Ultimate Rhoads

Try contacting the author and get some first hand information and if you still feel the way you do then that's reasonable. I've spoken with Andrew Klein and I have changed my opinion on this subject and have apologized to him for talking trash without knowing both sides of the story. Hook, line, si...

GUITARIDOL5682 wrote:A great shot from Tom Bell's collection i hope you don't mind me sharing this Cheers

I have GOT to be in this photo or somehow blocked out.

I'll take a closer look when I'm home on my 42" monitor.

Sounds like Steven Rosen put together a nice book, which is why his name is FIRST LISTED in the authoring credits. About the Author Steven Rosen is a professional music journalist with a career spanning over 37 years. During this period, he has published well over 1,000 articles appearing in major ...

Sounds like those hacks made a pretty nice book. Still waiting for you to address this http://www.ultimaterhoads.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8073&p=79688#p79688 Of course you won't ... ***************************************************************** Sounds like Steven Rosen put together a nice...

GUITARIDOL5682 wrote:The doc didn't happen because of costs or the dissapproval of the family.

It DIDN'T HAPPEN because it was a team of HACKS undertaking it.

Excuse after excuse after excuse after excuse.

Threat after threat after threat.

THE END.

I find it quite interesting that your ENTIRE posting history exists in this thread and this thread ONLY. Not one other post on the whole board you've found interesting enough to give your .02 on? Co-ink-e-dink? Probably not. http://i730.photobucket.com/albums/ww302/QualityColorConcertPhotos/shred2P...

So what about all the other professional photographers who would of been giving the same licence to review. I'm talking Neil Zlozower, Ross Halfin, Robert Ellis, Mark Weiss, Fin Costello, John Livzey, Neal Preston, Jeffrey Mayer,Alan Perry, Jay Banbury. Who are just a few of the 30+ contributors to...

it basically says, if you give us permission to use your material it is ours to do with what we will and you agree to us giving away your material to whomever; and the receiver does not have to pay for the privilege to use that material. You would have to be nuts to sign a contract worded in this m...

Thank you, RRP- the words on this document (their meaning and the implications) indeed support my theory that someone had intentions outside and beyond the scope of the documentary. For good and valuable consideration, the undersigned hereby irrevocably grants to DP the right to distribute, exhibit...

shred2 wrote:From what I have read, there are 100s of images in the book.
I don't see other photogs lining up here screaming injustice.
Or did I miss that part?

Who's screaming injustice? Maybe I missed that part.

You seem to do an awful lot of projecting.

Usually, legal agreements tend to be fairly specific about what a person can and cannot do as part of a contractual relationship. This one was NOT specific, in its assigned rights - which is why I chose to not participate in it. Vague would be an understatement. Pay special attention to THIS part o...

You can stop your attempted psychoanalyzing, because you are REALLY BAD at it. You're an Andrew Klein apologist - I get it. Keep swinging from his nuts. You do it well. I don't feel OWED anything - and haven't. Someone asked a question, I related WHY this person being SUED was completely unprofessi...

You are still angry and barking at the wrong people. I acknowledged that your photos were not published in the RR book. They don't owe you any money or credits, but you're still shouting. Offense is taken not given. Being offended doesn't make you right. You mentioned a photo of yours was used in t...

shred2 wrote:What exactly is the last horseshit email? And why should it mean anything to me?

Forget it. It's obviously too difficult for you to follow along.